Does backblaze support sync full#

It is better than most fuse based s3 file systems as it will cache to disk, or in my case an SSD array.

For deployments that don't need to load balance a handful of front-ends s3ql will get the job done.

It can be a bit of a chore to get it compiled, and it makes it almost impossible to scale horizontally.

multipart upload requires at least 2 partsДЇor those that just need a basic implementation this fork of s3ql does seem to work well.

does not support Content-Disposition, Content-Encoding, Content-Language, Content-MD5, or Expiry headers.

does not support blob-level access control.

does not return ETag as an MD5 hash, instead returning SHA1 hash.

bucket names must be between 6 and 50 characters and consistent of only letters, number, and hyphens.

b2 works a bit differently if you take a look at the protocol. I assume it's probably related to some of the limitations listed below. I've tried using s3proxy, but nextcloud fails to create files in the bucket.

Does backblaze support sync full#

It would be nice to see full support for b2 as a regular backend (external storages & primary storage). If someone wanted they could probably use that to mount B2 storage directly to the server running Nextcloud and I'm guessing use it directly (again, I'm too new to NextCloud to even know for sure that's viable, but it seems like it might be).ДЇinally for other interested in building integrations and the requirments for being listed on the integrations page: There is also a FUSE written in Python that seems mature: This one is even more popular but appears stalled:.None of those seem fully mature or widely used though. There are a few PHP Wrappers/Classes/SDKs/Clients in development for B2 independently though.

First, I am brand new to Nexctloud and have no idea how it implements external storage, so I am a long way from jumping in and starting work on this.ДЄs far as I know, BackBlaze doesn't provide an official B2 API client in any language.